Home
In*con"se*quence [entries|friends|calendar]
Undiurnal

[ website | Your Spin of the Day ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

Era-tic [27 Jan 2009|07:04pm]
[ music | Pandora ]

I watched the inauguration at work, via live webcast. I don't recall watching either of the two previous; there's a fair chance I was in class at the time.  I wonder what the next four years will be like.

I was at home for New Year's Eve.  That's pretty usual, with notable exceptions of '99-'00 in NYC and a subsequent year's event in Seattle.  I wonder what the next year will be like.

I was driving to work the other day when I had to dodge fireworks and ornate dragons for Tet festivities in my neighborhood.  No one gave me money for lunar new year.  I wonder what the next month will be like.

Chaos theory: if I take the West staircase to leave the building instead of the South, will the economy recover more quickly?  More slowly?

I wonder what it would be like to occupy a position from which one could have real impact on regional, national and global issues.

The worlds of most people, I think, are very limited in scope.  There are so many intangible goods and evils out there, but it's easy to understand an individual's focus on more tangible concerns like mortgage payments, savings, health insurance and food.  To me, this is the greatest failure of the Bush administration.

Despite the 9/11 and Iraq, W presided over a period economic strength.  I'm not really concerned with whether or not he inherited it from Clinton, or how it was an irresponsibly constructed house-of-cards, or even the inequity of wealth distribution throughout.  The point is that our now X-President was afforded an incredible opportunity to affect real positive change in the nation and world.  When people had the comfort and security at home to look outward and see the ills of the world, Bush governed like socialist despot: internal surveillance, massive government expansion, wars of choice and the ideological culling of non-partisan institutions.  Americans had a chance to breath deep, look outward and see the world; the Administration forced eyes inward and dared all who looked beyond the confront the sea change in reality we had wrought.

Obama is left to pick up the pieces.

Ironic then that the smartest, most cosmopolitan President in my lifetime should get stewardship of the country now.  Here we have someone with the will, charisma and brains to tackle problems on a global scale and he is given no choice but to focus inward.  It worked well enough for FDR, but he had almost four terms and a decidedly different media climate in which to make it happen.  I'll be surprised if Obama can even get his domestic framework in place before he's up for re-election.

I've heard people say that our nation's "unprecedented challenges present unprecedented opportunity," but, flatly, they're wrong.  "Challenges" dictate agenda.  Imagination is lost or so narrowed in its focus as to lose its promise.  Pity, that, as imagination is the lifeblood of our Union.

Once men imagined a nation with no king, where every man had the same rights as another.  A nation where the government no longer ruled men, but men ruled the government.  A bold dream, and one that was brought to fruition.  But the grandest, riskiest part of their dream was a living Constitution, that could be changed by future generations.  And so our forebears imagined, and in time brought participatory government to all men and then, finally, to all women.  Those, and countless other dreams brought us to that more perfect Union.  Yet, to my generation, all this is but history.

Imagination persists.  Dreams persist.  We've lent them to a good caretaker, I think.  Will this waking life allow us realization?

I wonder.

tender thy gumption

Life and other associated things [13 Jan 2009|06:13pm]
[ music | Pandora ]

Here we are again, Journal. You and me, it's been such a long while. But I have things to tell you, and thus we return to this place.

***

I've been working as a flight instructor for six months and change now. It's a bizarre job, in a lot of ways. Firstly, the pay is ludicrously inconsistent. My hourly rate is nothing to sneeze at, for sure, but I average around 65 paid hours per month. This, of course, does not include all the time I spend simply sitting around the office waiting for customers to walk in the door. In a lot of ways, this is how the aviation business works at-large. Senior airline pilots do indeed have ludicrous hourly wages, but they're limited to 100 paid hours per month and 1000 per year. And the paid hours? Only from the close of the cabin door prior to departure until when it opens after arrival. All the time sitting around airports, away from home in hotel rooms and otherwise doing things that could generally be considered work? Unpaid. There are also salaried positions in this industry, but in terms of pay and hours "worked" versus away-from-home they are fundamentally similar. In less verbose terms, I have my own little microcosm of the industry, in general.

I still find it odd to think of myself as an educator, despite the parts of my job title and certificates which include the word, "Instructor." I rarely find myself in a classroom and much of the "ground" work I do is one-on-one. The majority of my job is done in small planes, which are hardly interchangeable with 30'x 30' rooms filled with desks. But what I do is really no different. It's my job to impart skill and knowledge upon people, and to supervise them while they gain some real world experience. Flight training, I guess, is part internship in that regard. The one truly notable difference in my job as an educator is that, especially in early lessons, my students would literally be killing themselves were I not there. Granted, I'm sure first graders are entirely capable of killing themselves if left unsupervised in a classroom, but it's not a foregone conclusion.

One of the hardest decisions I have to make on a daily basis with my students is when to intervene. Generally, I want these pilots-to-be to see and feel the consequences of their actions; trial-and-error is actually a good way to get a feel for flying. My job is to make sure those consequences are informative without being dangerous. The question is always when to step in. The closer a situation gets to dangerous, the better an example of what can go wrong it is, but it takes knowledge of the situation, the aircraft involved and the student to know where that line is on any given day. Only a couple times have I erred on the wrong side of that equation.

What can be truly scary is when students do the completely unexpected. The other day I was flying with a student who is, generally, pretty good at landing the aircraft. It was our last landing of the day and the winds were light, though I had noticed them beginning to shear back-and-forth between a headwind and a crosswind. The student's approach was excellent and the landing was looking to be a real greaser but then, about ten feet above the ground, the wind changed direction and rather than kicking in some rudder and keeping the wings level, my student inexplicably pitched up and banked away from the wind, thereby getting us dangerously slow while exposing a large surface to the wind to push us away from the runway towards the ditch. So I had to intervene lest we stall and crash next to the pavement. I wasn't expecting it in the slightest, but thank goodness I had been keeping an eye on the wind and was aware of the situation.

Once we've taxied back and shut down, I then have to talk to the student about the landing, critiquing what went wrong without crushing his confidence or freaking him out more than he already is.

Honestly, my greatest assets as a flight instructor are my even disposition and laid-back attitude. Already I've had a handful of students come to me after working with other instructors and tell me how refreshing it is to fly with someone who will let them fly the plane and isn't always on edge. That latter part... maybe I just hide it well. It's really bizarre to be thought of as personable, though.

Back at my old job I was infamously unapproachable. Not that I wasn't a nice or helpful guy--I was, in fact, probably the nicest person in my department--but my general disdain for, well, everything, hid it quite well. People came to me last with their problems, which was a true blessing.

I guess it's because--and here we come full-circle--I'm an educator now. My casually annoyed, can't-be-bothered persona just won't cut it in that capacity. I suppose it shouldn't be that surprising. I was disturbingly well-liked back when I was camp counseling and I've always been an effective teacher. But it's a different side of me, and it's weird to be displaying it so regularly.

Whatever happened to nice on the inside, grumpy and snarky on the outside?

Still, I don't know how much longer I'll be doing this. I'm about two-thirds of the way to where I need to be, experience-wise, to get a job as a regional airline or freight pilot. The economy has more than a little to say about when that transition will be possible, however. Maybe I'll be instructing for couple more years, or maybe I'll be done with it this summer. I really don't know at this point.

Either way, I will be trying to relocate back to the West Coast come summer. If all goes well, Jackie will be leading that charge and I'll do my best to follow her geographically but, that notwithstanding, I miss having both mountains and green.

4 heretics thus spake | tender thy gumption

Garfield = null content [02 Mar 2008|05:41pm]
A little amusement.
1 heretic thus spake | tender thy gumption

Livejournalistic Futures [20 Jan 2008|10:37pm]
I haven't been posting a whole heck of a lot recently. There are many reasons for this, including the fact that I can be a bit of a foul-weather poster and, by-and-large, things have been pretty good for quite a while.

But there are some other concerns. Foremost among them is that I will soon be looking for employment in the world of aviation and I'm deathly afraid of being Googled. Between my unique name and relatively unmolested nick, I am one of the easiest non-celebrities to find on the web. At the very least, a goodly portion of early results are actually me. Seriously, go Google me. Woe be to me for not sharing my moniker with some D-lister.

There's very little I say that I'm concerned about, but one can never know what will earn the ire of others.

With regards to this journal, I will be doing the following:

  1. Friends-only: I will be making this journal friends-only, including all backdated entries. ETA: whenever I get around to it.
  2. Personal Journal: This journal will continue to be my personal journal and I'll try to update it more regularly.
  3. New Journals: I will also be starting two new journals. The first will be an aviation journal, detailing my experiences in and views on the industry. I certainly won't be the first pilot to do it, but I like the idea. The second will be a political journal, in the form of short "speeches" in response to events of the day. I thought of doing this latter one as part of my normal journal, but it should prove stylistically and thematically different enough to warrant its own header. The names/urls of these journals are forthcoming, depending upon a combination of what I like and what's available. Stay tuned.


Summation: new journals forthcoming; if you want to keep reading this one and aren't friended, post here or drop me an email.
1 heretic thus spake | tender thy gumption

A presidential quiz... not too far off. [07 Jan 2008|12:33am]
92% Mike Gravel
91% Dennis Kucinich
87% John Edwards
84% Barack Obama
82% Chris Dodd
78% Hillary Clinton
78% Joe Biden
75% Bill Richardson
36% Rudy Giuliani
28% John McCain
22% Ron Paul
22% Mike Huckabee
20% Mitt Romney
19% Tom Tancredo
12% Fred Thompson

2008 Presidential Candidate Matching Quiz

It's not too different from where I see it, though I favor Bill Richardson a bit more than the test does.

This test does fall victim to the big problem of polling, however, in that it pigeon-holes every issue as opposed to looking for a broader governance philosophy. Regardless of who we next elect president, issues will arise that were never addressed during the campaign. Before I'm really comfortable with a candidate, I need to understand the processes which will lead to their decision-making when the inevitable unpredicted event occurs. The only presidential hopefuls who have given that sort of information to date are Kucinich and Paul. I'm still waiting to hear from everyone else.
tender thy gumption

Commercial Ratings Done! [13 Dec 2007|01:46pm]
Commercial Single-Engine Land Add-on COMPLETE!

...on to Certified Flight Instructor--Airplane.
4 heretics thus spake | tender thy gumption

The best small car yet [30 Oct 2007|04:50pm]
Forget Segways; everyone should have one of these.
1 heretic thus spake | tender thy gumption

Uninformed Liberalism [29 Oct 2007|04:02pm]
An entry in two parts.

Part I

My aunt and uncle came to town earlier this week. It was really nice to see them and for Jackie to finally meet them.

Chris and Teke are musicians, folklorists, storytellers and, in Teke's case, a tall-ship captain. They are, in fact, excellent musicians. Both are talented singers and each is capable of playing at least a half-dozen instruments. Jackie and I had the opportunity to catch one of their shows on Saturday night. This, of course, was not a big show. It was a house concert with maybe 15-20 attendees plus a couple more who came later for the jam session. As the host said in the introduction, "you can make literally hundreds of dollars a year playing folk music."

Chris and Teke did an hour and a half set, about evenly divided between traditional songs and original material. It occurred to me sometime during the set that this was the first time I had seen them do a show in twenty years. They were very well-received. After a brief encore and a 30-minute break, the jam session commenced.

It's been my experience that--outside of country and standards--people in the music industry tend to be liberal. Folk artists, especially, fit this generalization. And while Chris and Teke most definitely are (as am I), their music tends to be apolitical by its very nature. I suppose you could write a ballad about how globalization, environmental degradation and inadequate social support structures led to the wreck of XYZ, but you might be stretching and you'd certainly be missing the drama. Long story, short, the jam session was largely activist in tone.

For the most part, it was pretty cool. One person, in particular, needed a better lyricist, but with five talented guitar players and an upright bass, it's hard not to have fun. I also have to look into getting a copy of Andre Villoch's Gum Wrapper Roses, from which Teke played Marlando the Magnificent.

Part II

The last song of the jam session, however, was a bit much for me. It was a song protesting the New Horizons mission. In particular or, at least initially, the song was about the questionable wisdom of sticking twenty-four pounds of plutonium on a tube of highly-explosive rocket fuel. Then it just... got off-topic. A folksy, story-protest song, it quickly got hung up on, "Why are we spending money in space when we could spend it on social programs on Earth?" Firstly, the money is being spent on Earth. Who do you think NASA pays? Martians? And it's not like NASA's programs are all about mapping Pluto. The majority, in fact, focus on Earth. You know, things like weather, climate variation, communications. And what of all the terra firma applications of space science? Advanced insulation, solar power, cancer treatments, GPS, environmental impact studies?

Let's not forget what NASA stands for either: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Do you like commercial flights crashing? No. You know, NASA did some great studies on wake turbulence, one of the great ways to get dead in an airplane.

Seriously, NASA = Good. Feel free to take them to task about launching not-insignificant amounts of highly-radioactive materials into space or, more relevantly, into the upper atmosphere in the case of an accident. But don't blame an organization as beneficial as NASA for welfare issues. NASA currently gets about 1% of GDP in funding. Pretty weak for the agency tasked with predicting weather, improving air travel, understanding the universe, getting humanity off Earth in case of a killer asteroid and, oh yeah, stopping that killer asteroid in the first place. People need to pick their wealth-redistribution targets a little better. The military maybe? Faith-based initiatives? Federal Reserve corporate bail-outs? The relatively untaxed rich? Big-business subsidies? Our policy of giving military aid to our friends, and then to our enemies so they don't attack said friends?

Or, hey, you know what we could do to vastly improve the position of future generations? Pay down the national debt. It's not sexy and it may not be easy to fit into a song, but we already spend several times what we do on NASA in servicing the national debt. Not paying it down, just keeping up with interest to foreign entities and domestic bond holders. Some predictions show servicing the debt taking up 10%--or more--of GDP within 50 years. Think of all the social services that even a couple percentage points of savings could provide. But, no, let's blame NASA. Freeze-dried ice cream is simply unforgivable.
4 heretics thus spake | tender thy gumption

Why I love Believer science [16 Oct 2007|04:03pm]
Alas, we get very few channels without cable here in Florida and, worse still, three of them are Christian networks. Thankfully, they are still capable of providing occasional amusement.

The other night I was flipping channels and noticed a program on Oetzi the Iceman, the Chalcolithic European mummy discovered in the glaciers of Italy in 1991. Looking at the watermark in the corner of the screen, I noted I was tuned to Good Life 45. I was intrigued: where could they be going with this.

First they gave some background on Oetzi: where he was found, speculations on how he died, etc., etc. Pretty bland, but I knew sooner or later it would get interesting. First, they noted his age at death: 45. To me, this seemed a cut-and-dry piece of analysis, but the producers clearly felt it deserved further exploration. As such, they brought on a scientist who asserted that, based upon the body's height, build and other characteristics, he was--developmentally speaking--only 20. I had not heard this theory before, and I can't imagine it being other than contentious. Unfortunately, the program's running time didn't allow for other (e.g. generally accepted) theories.

The scientist was quickly replaced on-screen by a man captioned as an, "Historical Scholar." He could not have been more excited about the find. Oetzi's age-vs.-development--combined with historical records including Chinese and Middle-Eastern mythology and, of course, the Bible--clearly proved that human longevity was greater in antiquity! Moses lived to be 120. Abraham 175. Noah 950. Thanks to the Iceman, we can now take these Bible Truths at face-value. At Oetzi's developmental rate, Moses would have been like a spry 53 year-old at his death. It was the miles, not the years, that got him. Abraham? A modern-day consistent 78. And Noah? A full, healthy, 423-year equivalent life. I don't know, maybe lifespans degraded on a logarithmic scale; they didn't really go into it.

But no need to stop...

Because Oetzi has conclusively proven Biblical longevity accurate, he also proves the Biblical age of the Earth. After all, the Bible provides a genealogy from *ahem* recorded history back to Creation. Since those numbers are infallible, we can date Creation to the "nightfall" preceding October 23rd, 4004 BC.

So there you have it. Earth is 6011 years old. Oetzi is about 5300. Meaning, by Ussher's chronology, he predates Abraham by roughly 1400 years and Noah, oddly, by 950. He would have been a contemporary of Enoch (Noah's great-grandfather). Alas, no heavenly ascension for this one. Poor guy. If he hadn't been shot with an arrow and cracked his skull open, he probably would have lived to be 2400 (and only looked a millennium old... or about as he is today).

In seven minutes the program had gone from introducing Oetzi to Creation. The quickness surprised even me.

It's one of my favorite Creationist tactics. Take a single piece of evidence (even a dubious one) and extrapolate all of Creation from it. Rocks fall when you drop them? Humans and dinosaurs lived together. Music effects people's moods? The Great Flood killed those pesky reptiles. The Iceman cometh? Young Earth. If only real science were so easy. I, for one, think that because I can scientifically prove I'm not wearing a shirt as I write this entry, my guitar shoots laser beams when I strum an Em.

I wish more vocal religious people would take a stance similar to the Dalai Lama:

"If science proves some belief of Buddhism wrong, then Buddhism will have to change. In my view, science and Buddhism share a search for the truth and for understanding reality. By learning from science about aspects of reality where its understanding may be more advanced, I believe that Buddhism enriches its own worldview."

New York Times 12 November 2005


The sentiment is bold and pragmatic, but it's the reasoning behind that makes it so admirable.
3 heretics thus spake | tender thy gumption

The kind of news that will ruin a perfectly good day... [12 Oct 2007|01:43am]
EA bought Bioware (and Pandemic Studios) today.
2 heretics thus spake | tender thy gumption

I hear rumor Iranian oil is almost as good as the Iraqi stuff... [26 Sep 2007|11:19pm]
Hooray! The Senate passed a resolution which officially labels the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as Specially Designated Global Terrorists.

I suppose we can be thankful that the portion directly supporting the use of force against Iran was deleted, but designating the standing army of a sovereign nation a terrorist organization seems to me a just as effective--if not more so--way of starting a new war.
tender thy gumption

First time is a charm [28 Aug 2007|02:41pm]
[ mood | giddy ]

Undiurnal - Commercial Multi-Engine Pilot.

11 heretics thus spake | tender thy gumption

Pownce! [27 Jul 2007|02:24pm]
Someone tossed me a Pownce invite, so if you're on the network, look me up. I have a couple invites of my own to toss out, too, if anyone is interested.
1 heretic thus spake | tender thy gumption

Frustrated with politics [20 Jul 2007|06:15pm]
Good on ol' Bush, trying to Executive Order away the Fifth Amendment. Just one step closer to the Imperial Presidency.

I think I'm going to make up some bumper stickers that say, "Constitution / Bill of Rights '08." I'll let you know if I actually get around to doing it.
tender thy gumption

Things noticed on the way back from a flight [15 Jul 2007|04:52pm]
1. Shoplifting

At the 7-11, a middle-aged, inebriated (what with, I'm not sure) man was ahead of me in line. He quickly turned to look at me and check out my uniform--to confirm I wasn't some sort of police or security, I suppose. Then he commenced into one of the oldest tricks in the book.

There was a single clerk working the counter, with the cigarette racks located on the wall behind him. The would-be shoplifter told the clerk he wanted a pack of cigarettes, mumbling incomprehensibly the brand he wanted. While the employee hopelessly searched around for the what the customer wanted, occasionally receiving new directives, the latter grabbed an LED flashlight from a display on the counter and stuffed it under his waistband. Soon after, the correct brand of fags was miraculously located.

About this time, the senior clerk, noticing the delay and building line, came to assist at the counter. While she was ringing up my Slurpee and bag of plantain chips I said to her, under my breath, "You might want to ask if he's going to pay for that flashlight." As she finished with my purchase, she leaned over and whispered something to the other clerk, who queried the shoplifter. He began to walk out, feigning that he hadn't heard, but subsequently questioned by both the employees, he surrendered his booty.

My good deed for the day.

Now, while I can never remember shoplifting myself, I have, on several occasions, known some friends and acquaintances to take impressive five-finger discounts. So did my friends get a pass because they're my friends and this guy get singled-out because he was an ass? Yes.

2. Road construction

There's a temporary road construction sign on the side of the road that reads, "Lane Changes Nightly." I have no idea what it means. No one is even working on the road.

3. Circus Circus

A little bit further down the road, across from the horse track, is the Circus Circus strip club. What amuses me about it is that, under "Circus Circus" on their neon sign it says, "GENTLEMEN'S CLUB." However, the tubes for "GENT" have failed, leaving only "LEMEN'S CLUB." Circus Circus: Le Men's Club--I think that nicely captures the bar's classlessness.
4 heretics thus spake | tender thy gumption

Total Garbage Entry [12 Jul 2007|11:56pm]
This post is just a totally gratuitous reminder for myself. You have my apologies for not writing anything of consequence.

Games I'm looking forward to:
  • Bioshock - August 21, 2007
    The "spiritual successor" to the outstanding System Shock series. While Bioshock developer Irrational Games produced System Shock 2, EA currently holds the rights to that franchise and, in fact, may themselves be developing a third iteration. Of course, EA has displayed significant facileness in ruining a great license, so I'm not holding my breath on that one. Back to the point, however, Bioshock is looking to be a fantastic successor.

  • Neverwinter Nights 2: Mask of the Betrayer - September 11, 2007
    The much-anticipated expansion to Neverwinter Nights 2 adds Genasi, half-drow, new classes, prestige classes, ups the level cap to 30 and promises 15-20 hours of storyline continuing the tale of the OC's hero.

  • Age of Conan - October 2007
    I didn't initially have much interest in this game, but I've since done a little digging and it seems like Funcom has learned a lot from their experiences with Anarchy Online and it's being displayed here. I also like that the game is aiming for an "M" rating. Who knows, maybe I'll get in the beta...

  • Tabula Rasa - Fall 2007
    Richard Garriott's (Ultima, Ultima Online, City of Heroes/Villains) newest project promises (according to him, at least) to be the first of the second generation of MMOs. It's ambitious, to say the least, but if Lord British and his team pull it off it could be a whole lot of fun. I wouldn't mind getting into this beta, either...

  • Mass Effect - November 2007 for 360, TBD for PC
    This is the game Bioware thought was just too good to turn into the third installment of Knights of the Old Republic. And, man, have they ever run with it. In fact, Bioware plans to make a trilogy out of it. But let's not get ahead of ourselves. As with KOTOR I & II, Mass Effect will initially be an Xbox (360) exclusive, likely coming to PC some months later. I don't expect to have a 360 any time soon, so I'll just have to wait.

  • Fallout 3 - Fall 2008
    When Interplay shuttered its legendary Black Isle Studios (Fallout, Icewind Dale, Baldur's Gate [with Bioware], Planescape: Torment), a 70% completed Fallout 3 (Van Buren) with it, hope was dim for the series. Interplay's subsequent bankruptcy, however, put rights to Fallout (though, notably, not MMO rights) on the market. Initially there were rumors that one of the studios headed by Black Isle veterans (Obsidian and the now-defunct Troika) or collaborator Bioware was going to pick it up. In the end, however, Elder Scrolls developer Bethesda got the license. The news was met with both joy (a solvent and proven RPG studio) and fear (that makes games totally unlike Fallout). Development news thus far has supported both arguments, so we'll just have to wait and see.

  • The Secret World - TBD
    Another Funcom MMO, this is the project on the list about which I'm most excited. Modern-day setting with conspiracy-laden plot from the minds behind The Longest Journey and Dreamfall. Of course, it's way too early to make sweeping conclusions about the game but, at the very least, a trailer is tentatively scheduled to be released this fall. I would be signed up for the beta, but you can't sign-up yet.


/end gratuity
4 heretics thus spake | tender thy gumption

Fire trucks? For me? Aw... you shouldn't have. No, really, I prefer no fire trucks. [20 May 2007|04:14pm]
CAMEL Lesson 15 today: simulated engine failures, single-engine performance demonstrations, emergency checklists, a take-off and a landing. Or, at least, that was the plan.

We head out to the plane--my instructor had just flown it with no difficulties--and do the usual pre-flight inspections; everything seems hunky-dory. We taxi, do our engine-run up check. All good, all good. Pick up a signatory departure, taxi to the runway, get our clearance and take-off. Rotate at 75, climb out at 88, retract gear when out of usable runway: "Gear in transit, gear unsafe, gear lights off--gear secured," transition our airspeed to a cruise climb of 100, turn on-course and off we go.

But the plane... it's handling a little... weird. It's taking a bit more power than usual to keep our airspeed up and our climb rate--for a Seminole, at least--is sucking just a wee bit. Huh. Engine gauges are all the in green. There's no undue yaw or roll telling me something is wrong with flaps, ailerons or an engine. It's just weird. Then, glancing out of my window and looking at the mirror on the left nacelle, I notice that the nose gear is still down. The nose gear light is off... that just ain't right.

First, we try swapping a bulb in from one of the main gear indicators: no change, it's not a bulb issue. We try recycling the gear. "Gear down, in transit, three green, no red, one in the mirror." That looks right... "Gear up, in transit, no lights... one in the mirror." Houston, we have a problem.

We turn the plane around, get current weather and head back to Sanford. Two pilots in the plane, we share radio, checklist and flying responsibilities. Cleared back into Sanford, my instructor, Trevor, gets on with the tower and our maintenance staff and let's them know we're having gear issues. All the gear goes down and we do a low pass over the center runway to give them a look at our gear and make sure the mains--which we don't have a view of from inside the plane--are coming down. All looks good.

The problem here, however, is the nose gear. While it appears to be down and locked, given our indicator light in malfunctioning, we have no way of knowing--for sure--that it's locked. It would be decidedly not cool to come in for landing and have it collapse under us on the runway. Not something unmanageable, mind you, but it would certainly total the airplane.

So we get a little airspace cleared just north of the airport to circle around for a while to pull some Gs to attempt to force-lock the gear, discuss the best course of action with our maintenance people and, just as importantly, burn off some of that extra fuel. Content we've done what we can, we inform the tower we're ready to land on 9 Center.

Tower clears us to land and asks that oh-so-comforting question: "How many souls on board and how much fuel are you carrying?"

"Two SOBs, and about three hours," Trevor responds.

Here we go.

Trevor, obviously, has the controls while I verify checklists and the like. On our base legs, I see the fire trucks taking their positions on the adjacent taxiway. He brings it in nice and slow with a tiny descent gradient as though he were doing a soft-field landing. He touches down soft and skips the mains a little bit, but that's okay because our concern is keeping as much weight as possible off of the nose wheel. Finally, the nose gear touches and... it holds. Sighs of relief all around. We taxi off the runway and shut it down so maintenance can take a look and make sure the gear is, indeed, locked and suitable for further taxi.

The mechanics hop out of their van and take a look: everything appears to be in order for a normal taxi. We thank the kind firemen, hop back in our plane and start it up to taxi to the hangar for repairs...

...or, at least, that's what we would have done had our engine started. For whatever reason, the left engine now will not start. On the verge of calling our A & Ps back out, we try the right engine, which works fine, and request a single-engine taxi. Cleared, we head back to the barn jamming the right rudder.

More adventure than I needed, that's for sure.

On the bright side, the 1.2 hours in the plane will be credited to my account due to a maintenance cancellation, and I got 4/4 on the Equipment Malfunctions portion of the lesson. Didn't get anything else done, though.

Before the lesson I remember asking Trevor, in reference to his previous flight using the same aircraft: "You didn't break my plane, did you?"

Liar.
4 heretics thus spake | tender thy gumption

ATHF:MFFT [03 May 2007|06:57pm]
I really enjoyed Aqua Teen Hunger Force Colon Movie Film for Theaters. That said, like many movies (X2:X-Men United, anyone?) the best part, by far, was the opening.

Here's some people videos from people who snuck a digicam into the show. The second one has added subtitles of a size appropriate to YouTube quality:

The whole bit.
With subtitles.

I'll try to make some purposeful post in the near future, but I've been a bit busy lately.
tender thy gumption

A longer, more topical post may follow, but probably not. [19 Apr 2007|05:58pm]
One man's reaction to the Virgina Tech shootings, YTMND style. I think we all knew this was coming...

...and stolen from a friend's journal, another Fox News exclusive!

...and a better take, from along the same lines.
1 heretic thus spake | tender thy gumption

Euros, Yen and Yuan--the wave of the future [15 Apr 2007|12:35am]
Interesting article here on the potential (inevitable?) collapse of the US dollar. While the article isn't written in a fundamentally journalistic style, it does bring together a number of disparate pieces on the subject in a relatively coherent fashion. Trade deficits are scary things when large enough and let go on long enough...
1 heretic thus spake | tender thy gumption

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]